Skip to main content

Metric details

Every pilot's reading on every behaviour, family by family.

Analysis computed

best: could be chance (0.19)

best: too few pilots (0.97)

#PilotOut-climbCore sLeaveRateKept%TopOut%Round
1Amber Tsai—62 (2 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.1 (2 climbs ≥ 90 s)——0.07 (38 circles, 100% left)
2Andy Schmidt61 (5 shared climbs)45 (5 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.0 (5 climbs ≥ 90 s)—107 (mean on-course altitude 62% of band)0.20 (57 circles, 93% left)
3Anthony Meechan57 (15 shared climbs)30 (3 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.9 (1 climb ≥ 90 s)100 (5/5 circling bouts led to climbs)70 (mean on-course altitude 57% of band)0.17 (63 circles, 92% left)
5James Wynd—— (instrument records every 5 s; this measure needs every 4 s or faster)0.8 (3 climbs ≥ 90 s)86 (6/7 circling bouts led to climbs)34 (mean on-course altitude 24% of band)— (instrument records every 5 s; this measure needs every 2 s or faster)
6Curtis Greenwood55 (4 shared climbs)157 (1 climb ≥ 60 s)0.7 (1 climb ≥ 90 s)50 (3/6 circling bouts led to climbs)58 (mean on-course altitude 40% of band)0.20 (113 circles, 80% left)
7Donny Gardner76 (5 shared climbs)2 (3 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (2 climbs ≥ 90 s)0 (0/3 circling bouts led to climbs)—0.16 (40 circles, 53% left)
8Connor Hansen69 (5 shared climbs)33 (2 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.8 (1 climb ≥ 90 s)0 (0/4 circling bouts led to climbs)—0.18 (16 circles, 100% left)
9John Greenwood—57 (4 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.3 (3 climbs ≥ 90 s)—-9 (mean on-course altitude -13% of band)0.16 (82 circles, 5% left)
9Mark Tyminski13 (1 shared climb)————— (3 circles, 100% left)

Time to core thermals

Measured in seconds · no expected direction

How long the pilot takes to get into the best lift after they arrive in a thermal. For each thermal of 60 s or more, we measure the seconds from the entry until the 30 s rolling climb rate first reaches 90% of its peak in that thermal. The value is the median across the thermals of the pilot. There is no expected direction. Time spent working into the core is not lost if the pilot ends up in the better lift, so the sign of the correlation says whether the hunt paid on this day. We leave out a pilot whose instrument records a position only every 5 seconds or less often. A track that coarse cannot show this detail, and the pilot would seem to fly differently when they do not.

1 pilot left out: their instrument records a position only every 5 s, too seldom for this measure.

Share of lift turned in that was kept as a climb

Measured in percent · no expected direction

How selective the pilot is about the lift they stop for. Each period of circling of 30 s or more after the start counts as lift that the pilot sampled. If the period overlaps a detected thermal, the pilot kept that lift. If it does not, they turned a few circles and left it. The value is the percentage kept. A low value means they are selective. A high value means they keep almost every climb they turn in. There is no expected direction: selection wins on a strong day and wastes time on a weak one.

Acceptance by hour

HourMedian accepted (%)pilots
924
256
01

Median per-pilot acceptance %, bucketed by the hour (competition time zone).

How round and consistent the circles were

Measured in ratio · no expected direction

Whether the pilot flies clean, repeatable circles, or moves around the thermal. We fit each detected circle by least squares. The RMS fit error divided by the fitted radius measures how round the turn was. The value is the median over all of the circles of the pilot. A lower value means smoother and more consistent turns. There is no expected direction: a rough trace can be a pilot chasing a drifting or broken core rather than a pilot circling badly. We leave out a pilot whose instrument records a position less often than every 2 seconds. A track that coarse cannot show this detail, and the pilot would seem to fly differently when they do not.

Turn direction across the field: 68% left (418 circles).

1 pilot left out: their instrument records a position only every 5 s, too seldom for this measure.

best: too few pilots (0.71)

best: clear pattern (0.94)

#PilotFloor%LowSavesSearch%
1Amber Tsai—0.013
2Andy Schmidt—0.012
3Anthony Meechan34 (6 descents, lowest -50% of band)0.052
5James Wynd10 (2 descents, lowest -11% of band)1.0 (deepest save from 4% of band)35
6Curtis Greenwood51 (3 descents, lowest 11% of band)0.082
7Donny Gardner—0.083
8Connor Hansen—0.093
9John Greenwood—0.084
9Mark Tyminski—0.0100

Distance covered between climbs

Measured in kilometres · higher is better

How far the pilot gets down the course before they must stop and circle again. This is the direct reading of how often they stop. The value is the scored flown distance divided by the number of thermals taken after the start, so 3 km means three kilometres of course for each climb. The pilot must fly 20 km or more. The note of each pilot adds their mean climb percentile inside shared thermals, so you can read the number of stops together with the climb strength. Long legs between weak climbs is a different day from long legs between strong ones. We leave out a pilot whose instrument records a position only every 5 seconds or less often. A track that coarse cannot show this detail, and the pilot would seem to fly differently when they do not.

1 pilot left out: their instrument records a position only every 5 s, too seldom for this measure.

Share of race time spent hunting for the next climb

Measured in percent · lower is better

Time that goes into neither a climb nor progress down the course. This is the time spent to find lift, to stay up, and to decide what to do next. The value is the share of the speed-section time, from the start to ESS or to the landing, in which the pilot neither climbed in a thermal nor glided with real net speed. A lower value means less time lost between climbs.

Speed-section phase shares, field p25/median/p75: climb 0/15/25% · glide 3/17/37% · search 35/82/84%

best: could be chance (0.21)

best: too few pilots (0.80)